4.5 Article

Rapid Turnover of Glycogen in Memory Formation

期刊

NEUROCHEMICAL RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 11, 页码 2456-2463

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11064-012-0805-2

关键词

Adrenoceptors; Astrocytes; Glycogen turnover; Glycogenolysis; Noradrenaline; Memory

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [545952]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of noradrenaline acting at alpha(2)-AR and beta(2)-ARs on the turnover of glycogen after learning has been investigated. The role of glycogen turnover in memory formation was examined using weakly-reinforced, single trial bead discrimination training in day-old domestic chickens. This study follows our previous work that focused on the need for glycogen breakdown (glycogenolysis) during learning. Inhibition of glycogenolysis by 1,4-dideoxy-1,4-imino-d-arabinitol (DAB) prevented the consolidation of strongly-reinforced learning and inhibited memory. The action of DAB could be prevented by stimulating glycogenolysis with the selective beta(2)-AR agonist, zinterol. Stimulation of alpha(2)-ARs has been shown to lead to an increase in the turnover and synthesis of glycogen. In the present study, we examined the effect of inhibition of alpha(2)-AR stimulated glycogen turnover (measured as(14)C-glucose incorporation into glycogen) on the ability of zinterol to promote the consolidation of weakly reinforced memory. In astrocytes, the selective alpha(2)-AR agonist clonidine stimulated C-14-glucose incorporation into glycogen in chick astrocytes and this was inhibited by the selective alpha(2)-AR antagonist, ARC239. The critical importance of the timing of ARC239 injection relative to training and intracerebral administration of zinterol was examined. It is concluded that our data provides evidence for a readily accessible labile pool of glycogen in brain astrocytes. If glycogen synthesis is inhibited, the can be depleted within 10 min, thus preventing zinterol from promoting consolidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据