4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

PECVD-AlOx/SiNx passivation stacks on wet chemically oxidized silicon: Constant voltage stress investigations of charge dynamics and interface defect states

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
卷 135, 期 -, 页码 49-56

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.09.024

关键词

Silicon; Surface passivation; Aluminum oxide; Silicon nitride; Capacitance voltage

资金

  1. EU project NanoPV [FP7-NMP3-SL-2011-246331]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The negative charge formation, the charge-trapping mechanisms and the interface defect passivation of aluminum oxide/silicon nitride (AlOx/SiNx) stacks deposited by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition on p-type crystalline silicon (c-Si) are investigated. Constant voltage stress (CVS) investigations combined with capacitance-voltage (C-V) hysteresis analysis indicate the influence of different thermal treatments on the negative charge formation and allow discerning between fixed and trapped charges in the AlOx/SiNx system. The thermal budget during SiNx deposition activates negatively charged traps. An annealing step leads to the formation of a stable, fixed negative charge and reduces the defect state density (D-it) at the c-Si/AlOx interface. A wet-chemical silicon oxidation (SiOx) of the c-Si surface reduces Dit even further, but introduces additional traps at the wet-chemical SiOx/AlOx interface. These traps lead to instabilities of the negative charge density and have a detrimental effect on the passivation quality. However, a firing step leads to the formation of a higher negative charge density due to charged traps. Combined with the enhanced chemical passivation, this results in a higher passivation quality than upon annealing. The trap-related negative charge upon firing is unstable due to electron detrapping. However, a positive CVS can recharge traps in the wet-chemical SiOx/AlOx/SiNx system negatively through electron injection from the c-Si. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据