4.5 Article

Brainstem Concentrations of Cholesterol are not Influenced by Genetic Ablation of the Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor

期刊

NEUROCHEMICAL RESEARCH
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 311-315

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11064-008-9777-7

关键词

Low-density lipoprotein receptor; Brain; Cholesterol; Brainstem; Cortex

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Doctoral Research award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLr) mediates the uptake of LDL particles enriched with cholesterol, into several tissues. In contrast to other tissues, the brain is thought to obtain cholesterol solely by de novo synthesis, yet certain brain regions such as the brainstem are highly enriched with the LDLr. The goal of the present study was to assess the role of the LDLr in maintaining cholesterol concentrations in the brainstem of wildtype and LDLr knockout (LDLr-/-) mice. Cholesterol concentrations were also measured in the cortex, which served as a reference point, due to the lower expression of the LDLr, as compared to the brainstem. Methods LDLr-/- and wildtype mice consumed an AIN-93G diet ad libitum until 7 weeks of age. After microwaving, the cortex and anterior brain stem were isolated for cholesterol analysis. Cholesterol was extracted into chloroform/methanol, derivatized in trimethylsilyl chloride and measured by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Results Concentrations of cholesterol in the brainstem did not differ statistically between LDLr-/- (18.8 +/- A 1.6 mg/g wet weight brain) and wildtype (19.1 +/- A 2.0). Cortical cholesterol concentrations also did not differ statistically between LDLr-/- (11.0 +/- A 0.4 mg/g wet weight brain) and wildtype (11.1 +/- A 0.2) mice. Conclusion The LDLr is not necessary for maintaining cholesterol concentrations in the cortex or brainstem, suggesting that other mechanisms are sufficient to maintain brain cholesterol concentrations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据