4.5 Article

Effect of melatonin and melatonylvalpromide on beta-amyloid and neurofilaments in N2a cells

期刊

NEUROCHEMICAL RESEARCH
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 1138-1144

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11064-007-9563-y

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; beta-amyloid; neurofilament; melatonin; melatonylvalproylamide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, we have studied the effect of melatonin (Mt) and melatonin derivative, i.e., melatonylvalpromide (Mtv), on cell viability, beta-amyloid (A beta) production, cell morphology, and expression and phosphorylation of neurofilament proteins in wild-type murine neuroblastoma N2a (N2a/wt) and N2a stably transfected with amyloid precursor protein (N2a/APP) cell lines. The study used MTT assay, Sandwich ELISA, immunocytochemistry and Western blots techniques. The results showed that both Mt and Mtv could increase cell viability, but Mtv did so more effectively. The N2a/APP showed shorter and less amount of cell processes than N2a/wt, and Mtv but not Mt slightly improved the morphological changes in N2A/APP. Both Mt and Mtv suppressed the A beta level in cell lysates, but the effect of Mtv was stronger than Mt. The immunoreaction to the non-phosphorylated neurofilament proteins probed by SMI32 and SMI33 were remarkably weaker in N2a/APP than N2a/wt, while the immunoreaction to the phosphorylated neurofilament proteins at SMI34 epitopes was slightly stronger in N2a/APP than N2a/wt, suggesting higher phosphorylation level of neurofilament proteins in N2a/APP. Treatment of the cells with Mt and Mtv increased the immunoreaction at SMI32 and SMI33 epitopes, while only Mtv but not Mt decreased the staining at SMI34 epitope, suggesting both Mt and Mtv promote dephosphorylation of neurofilament at SMI32 and SMI33 epitopes, while Mtv stimulates dephosphorylation of neurofilament at SMI34 epitope. These results suggest that Mtv may be a better candidate in arresting the intracellular accumulation of A beta and protecting the cells from A beta-related toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据