4.7 Article

Embryonic alteration of motoneuronal morphology induces hyperexcitability in the mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 116-126

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.02.011

关键词

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; SOD1 mouse; Embryonic spinal cord; Motoneuron; Hyperexcitability; Morphology; Electrophysiology; 3D reconstruction; Computer simulation

资金

  1. ARSLA (Association pour la Recherche sur la Sclerose Laterale Amyotrophique et autres maladies du motoneurone)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an age-dependent fatal neurodegenerative disease in which upper and lower motoneurons (MNs) are targeted for death in adults, increasing lines of evidence indicate that MNs display physiological and morphological abnormalities during postnatal development, long before disease onset. Here, using transgenic mice overexpressing the G93A mutation of the human Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene (SOD1), we show that SOD1(G93A) embryonic lumbar E17.5 MNs already expressed abnormal morphometric parameters, including a deep reduction of their terminal segments length. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from acute spinal cord preparations were made to characterize functional changes in neuronal activity. SOD1(G93A) E17.5 MNs displayed hyperexcitability compared to wild-type MNs. Finally, we performed realistic simulations in order to correlate morphometric and electrophysiological changes observed in embryonic SOD1(G93A) MNs. We found that the reduced dendritic elongation mainly accounted for the hyperexcitability observed in SOD1(G93A) MNs. Altogether, our results emphasize the remarkable early onset of abnormal neural activity in the commonly used animal model for ALS, and suggest that embryonic morphological changes are the primary compensatory mechanisms, the physiological adjustments being only secondary to morphological alterations. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据