4.7 Article

Fast motor axon loss in SMARD1 does not correspond to morphological and functional alterations of the NMJ

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 169-182

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.12.010

关键词

SMARD1; Nmd(2J) mouse; Motor axon; Neuromuscular junction; Neurotransmission

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinsschaft [SFB 581/B24, B18, Z3]
  2. Fundacio Marato TV3 [062331]
  3. CIBERNED
  4. [FIS-PS09/01267]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spinal muscular atrophy with respiratory distress type 1 (SMARD1) is a childhood motoneuron disease caused by mutations in the gene encoding for IGHMBP2, an ATPase/Helicase. Paralysis of the diaphragm is an early and prominent clinical sign resulting both from denervation and myopathy. In skeletal muscles, muscle atrophy mainly results from loss of motoneuron cell bodies and axonal degeneration. Although it is well known that loss of motoneurons at the lumbar spinal cord is an early event in the pathogenesis of the disease, it is not clear whether the corresponding proximal axons and NMJs are also early affected. In order to address this question, we have investigated the time course of the disease progression at the level of the motoneuron cell body, proximal axon (ventral root), distal axon (sciatic nerve), NMJ, and muscle fiber in Nmd(2J) mice, a mouse model for SMARD1. Our results show an early and apparently parallel loss of motoneurons, proximal axons, and NMJs. In affected muscles, however, denervated fibers coexist with NMJs with normal morphology and unaltered neurotransmission. Furthermore, unaffected axons are able to sprout and reinnervate muscle fibers, suggesting selective vulnerability of neurons to Ighmbp2 deficiency. The preservation of the NMJ morphology and neurotransmission in the Nmd(2J) mouse until motor axon loss takes place, differs from that observed in SMA mouse models in which NMJ impairment is an early and more general phenomenon in affected muscles. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据