4.7 Article

Copper/zinc chelation by clioquinol reduces spinal cord white matter damage and behavioral deficits in a murine MOG-induced multiple sclerosis model

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 382-391

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.01.012

关键词

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; Multiple sclerosis; Copper; Zinc; Microglia; BBB disruption; MMP-9; Autophagy

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Korea government (MEST) [2012R1A2A2A01040132]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of clioquinol (CQ), a metal chelator, on multiple sclerosis pathogenesis. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis was induced by immunization with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG(35-55)) in female mice. Three weeks after the initial immunization, demyelination and immune cell infiltration in the spinal cord were analyzed. CQ (30 mg/kg) was given by gavage once per day for the entire experimental course. CQ profoundly reduced the daily clinical score and incidence rate of EAE mice. The CQ-mediated inhibition of the clinical course of EAE was accompanied by suppression of demyelination and reduced infiltration by encephalitogenic immune cells including CD4, CD8, CD20 and F4/80 positive cells. CQ also remarkably inhibited EAE-associated BBB disruption and MMP-9 activation. Autophagy contributes to clearance of aggregated proteins in astrocytes and neurons. The present study found that EAE increased the induction of autophagy and CQ further increased this expression. Furthermore, the present study found that post-treatment with CQ also reduced the clinical score of EAE and spinal cord demyelination. These results demonstrate that CQ inhibits the clinical features and neuropathological changes associated with EAE. The present study suggests that transition metals may be involved in several steps of multiple sclerosis pathogenesis. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据