4.7 Article

Progranulin Leu271LeufsX10 is one of the most common FTLD and CBS associated mutations worldwide

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 379-385

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.11.008

关键词

Frontotemporal dementia; Corticobasal syndrome; Progressive supranuclear palsy; Motorneuron disease; PGRN; MAPT haplotype; Deletion; Mutation prevalence; Mutation penetrance

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [RC2008, ex 56/05/4, ex 56/05/11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in the progranulin gene (PGRN) are a major cause of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Herein we estimated the contribution of the PGRN Leu271LeufsX10 mutation to FTLD and related disorders in the Brescia cohort The PGRN Leu271LeufsX10 mutation was found in 31% of corticobasal syndrome (CBS), 29% of frontotemporal dementia with motorneuron disease (FTD-MND), 15% of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (FTD), 9.5% of primary progressive aphasia (PPA), 2% dementia with Lewy bodies and 0% of progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy cases. The prevalence strongly increased in familial forms (75% 50% FTD-MND, 27% FTD, 18% PPA): in our cohort this mutation is a major disease determinant for FTLD-related CBS, disorders with a prominent motor component. MAPT haplotype was demonstrated to be a disease modifier in PGRN Leu271LeufsX10 carriers: in H1H2 subjects the disease onset was earlier than in H2H2 individuals. Sequencing of the whole PGRN gene disclosed a previously described mutation (c.2T>C, Met1X) and three novel ones (c.709-3; c.1011delG, His340ThrfsX21; c.1021C>T, Gln341X) in single families. In the Brescia cohort, while MAPT mutations have low prevalence, mutations in PGRN were shown in 28% of familial FTLD and 75% of familial CBS cases. The PGRN Leu271LeufsX10 mutation becomes one of the most common mutations worldwide, since it was identified in 38 patients belonging to 27 unrelated families. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据