4.7 Article

Activation of brain metabolism and fos during limbic seizures: The role of Locus Coeruleus

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 388-399

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.02.008

关键词

Locus Coeruleus; norepinephrine; status epilepticus; [C-14]2-deoxyglucose; fos; piriform cortex; limbic seizures

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The noradrenergic nucleus Locus Coeruleus (LC) densely innervates limbic structures. In rats, the damage to LC by the neurotoxin DSP-4, converts episodic limbic seizures induced by bicuculline infusion in the anterior piriform cortex (APC) into self-sustaining status epilepticus (SE). SE induced by this approach is similar to SE induced by confusing cyclothiazide and bicuculline into APC in rats bearing an intact LC. As opposed to other commonly used rat SE models (e.g. systemic kainate or pilocarpine), this approach allows one to analyze the effects of SE on brain regions which are solely due to spreading of seizure activity, rather than to direct effect of systemic chemoconvulsant. We evaluated the expression of Fos protein (an immediate early gene product), and the local cerebral metabolic rates for [C-14] 2-deoxyglucose (ICMRglc), in rats following SE induced either by cyclothiazide+ bicuculline or by DSP-4+bicuculline. We demonstrated that regional Fos expression after SE does not parallel the increase in ICMRglc, in LC-lesioned rats. In DSP-4+bicuculline rats there is an overall lower expression of the protein as compared with the cyclothiazide+bicuculline or bicuculline alone groups; even more, such a difference co-exists with an higher ICMRglc in the DSP-4+bieucutfine-treated rats in some regions, as compared with the other groups. These data show that LC neurons play an important role in determining immediate early genes expression even in conditions of strong pathological activation, such as limbic SE. This might have relevant effects in the plastic mechanisms related with epileptogenesis. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据