4.5 Article

In vivo mapping of brainstem nuclei functional connectivity disruption in Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 72, 期 -, 页码 72-82

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.08.012

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; VTA; LC; Brain disconnection; Neuropsychiatric symptoms

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [GR-2011-02351457]
  2. Alzheimer's Association, United States [AARG-18-566270s]
  3. Italian Ministry of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We assessed here functional connectivity changes in the locus coeruleus (LC) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). We recruited 169 patients with either AD or amnestic mild cognitive impairment due to AD and 37 elderly controls who underwent cognitive and neuropsychiatric assessments and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. Connectivity was assessed between LC and VTA and the rest of the brain. In amnestic mild cognitive impairment patients, VTA disconnection was predominant with parietal regions, while in AD patients, it involved the posterior nodes of the default-mode network. We also looked at the association between neuropsychiatric symptoms (assessed by the neuropsychiatric inventory) and VTA connectivity. Symptoms such as agitation, irritability, and disinhibition were associated with VTA connectivity with the parahippocampal gyrus and cerebellar vermis, while sleep and eating disorders were associated with VTA connectivity to the striatum and the insular cortex. This suggests a contribution of VTA degeneration to AD pathophysiology and to the occurrence of neuropsychiatric symptoms. We did not find evidence of LC disconnection, but this could be explained by the size of this nucleus, which makes it difficult to isolate. These results are consistent with animal findings and have potential implications for AD prognosis and therapies. (C) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据