4.5 Article

Functional connectivity and graph theory in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 757-768

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.10.081

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Biomarker; Functional connectivity; Graph theory; Resting-state

资金

  1. Medical Scientist Training Program Grant [5T32GM007200-37]
  2. Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC) Pilot Grant [3255 ADRC 26]
  3. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [K23MH081786]
  4. National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) [R01NR012907, R01NR012657, R01NR14449]
  5. Alzheimer's Association [NIRP-12-257747]
  6. National Institute of Aging (NIA) [P01AG026276, P01AG03991, P50 AG05681]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) has a long preclinical phase in which amyloid and tau cerebral pathology accumulate without producing cognitive symptoms. Resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging has demonstrated that brain networks degrade during symptomatic AD. It is unclear to what extent these degradations exist before symptomatic onset. In this study, we investigated graph theory metrics of functional integration (path length), functional segregation (clustering coefficient), and functional distinctness (modularity) as a function of disease severity. Further, we assessed whether these graph metrics were affected in cognitively normal participants with cerebrospinal fluid evidence of preclinical AD. Clustering coefficient and modularity, but not path length, were reduced in AD. Cognitively normal participants who harbored AD biomarker pathology also showed reduced values in these graph measures, demonstrating brain changes similar to, but smaller than, symptomatic AD. Only modularity was significantly affected by age. We also demonstrate that AD has a particular effect on hub-like regions in the brain. We conclude that AD causes large-scale disconnection that is present before onset of symptoms. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据