4.5 Article

Blood pressure decrease correlates with tau pathology and memory decline in hypertensive elderly

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 64-71

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.06.011

关键词

Low blood pressure; CSF biomarkers; Cognition

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health [AG12101, AG08051, AG022374, HL-111724-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In hypertension (HTN), cerebral blood flow regulation limits are changed, and the threshold for blood pressure (BP) at which perfusion is safely maintained is higher. This shift may increase the brain's vulnerability to lower BP in subjects with vascular disease. We investigated whether longitudinal reduction in mean arterial pressure (MAP) was related to changes in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease in a group of cognitively healthy elderly with and without HTN. The relationships among MAP, memory decline, and hippocampal atrophy were also examined. Seventy-seven subjects (age 63.4 +/- 9.4, range 44-86 years; education 16.9 +/- 2.1, range 10-22 years; 60% women) were assessed twice, 2 +/- 0.5 years apart. At both time points, all subjects underwent full medical and neuropsychological evaluations, lumbar punctures, and magnetic resonance imaging examinations. Twenty-five subjects had HTN. Hyper-and normotensive subjects did not differ in their CSF biomarkers, hippocampal volumes (HipVs), or memory scores at baseline. In the entire study group, the increase in tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau(181)) was associated with a decline in verbal episodic memory (beta = -0.30, p = 0.01) and HipV reduction (beta = -0.27, p = 0.02). However, longitudinal decrease in MAP was related to memory decline (beta = 0.50, p = 0.01) and an increase in p-tau181 (beta = -0.50, p = 0.01) only in subjects with HTN. Our findings suggest that the hypertensive group may be sensitive to BP reductions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据