4.5 Article

Critical ages in the life course of the adult brain: nonlinear subcortical aging

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 34, 期 10, 页码 2239-2247

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.04.006

关键词

Aging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Longitudinal; Trajectory; Atrophy; Amygdala; Cerebral cortex; Hippocampus; Thalamus; White matter

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council [177404, 186092, 175066, 189507, 204966, 154313/V50, 177458/V50]
  2. University of Oslo
  3. National Institutes of Health, USA [R37 AG011230]
  4. European Research Council
  5. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P50 AG05681, P01 AG03991, R01 AG021910, P50 MH071616, U24 RR021382, R01 MH56584]
  6. ADNI (Principal Investigator: Michael Weiner
  7. NIH grant) [U01 AG024904]
  8. National Institute on Aging
  9. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Age-related changes in brain structure result from a complex interplay among various neurobiological processes, which may contribute to more complex trajectories than what can be described by simple linear or quadratic models. We used a nonparametric smoothing spline approach to delineate cross-sectionally estimated age trajectories of the volume of 17 neuroanatomic structures in 1100 healthy adults (18-94 years). Accelerated estimated decline in advanced age characterized some structures, for example hippocampus, but was not the norm. For most areas, 1 or 2 critical ages were identified, characterized by changes in the estimated rate of change. One-year follow-up data from 142 healthy older adults (60-91 years) confirmed the existence of estimated change from the cross-sectional analyses for all areas except 1 (caudate). The cross-sectional and the longitudinal analyses agreed well on the rank order of age effects on specific brain structures (Spearman rho = 0.91). The main conclusions are that most brain structures do not follow a simple path throughout adult life and that accelerated decline in high age is not the norm of healthy brain aging. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据