4.5 Article

Increased blood-brain barrier vulnerability to systemic inflammation in an Alzheimer disease mouse model

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 34, 期 8, 页码 2064-2070

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.02.010

关键词

Noncognitive symptoms; Infection; Alzheimer's disease; Blood-brain barrier; Inflammatory cytokine

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  3. Mitsubishi Pharma Research Foundation
  4. Japan Heart Foundation Research Grant
  5. Takeda Science Foundation
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [11J05675] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Behavioral and psychological problems are often observed in patients with dementia such as that associated with Alzheimer disease, and these noncognitive symptoms place an extremely heavy burden on the family and caregivers. Although it is well know that these symptoms often are triggered by infection of peripheral organs, the underlying mechanisms for these pathological conditions are still unclear. In this study, using an Alzheimer amyloid precursor protein (APP)-transgenic mouse, we analyzed behavioral changes and brain inflammatory response induced by peripheral administration of lipopolysaccharide. Application of a unique in vivo microdialysis system revealed that the increase in brain inflammatory cytokine (interleukin-6) level was significantly higher in APP-Tg than in wild-type mice after peripheral lipopolysaccharide injection, which was associated with more severe sickness behaviors. The blood-brain barrier became more permeable in APP-Tg mice during peripherally evoked inflammation, suggesting the increased vulnerability of the blood-brain barrier to inflammation in this animal model of Alzheimer's disease. These findings might provide insight into the pathogenesis of noncognitive symptoms in dementia and a basis to develop new therapeutic treatments for them. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据