4.5 Article

Amyloid beta immunization worsens iron deposits in the choroid plexus and cerebral microbleeds

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 34, 期 11, 页码 2613-2622

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.05.013

关键词

A beta-immunization; Aging; Alzheimer's disease; ARIA (amyloid imaging related abnormalities); Choroid plexus; Iron; Lemur; Microcebus murinus; Microhemorrhages; MRI; Primate

资金

  1. France-Alzheimer association
  2. CNRS
  3. Regional Council of Martinique
  4. National Foundation for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders
  5. National Institute on Aging [R01-AG020197]
  6. Hoffmann-La Roche

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anti-amyloid beta (A beta) immunotherapy provides potential benefits in Alzheimer's disease patients. Nevertheless, strategies based on A beta(1-42) peptide induced encephalomyelitis and possible micro-hemorrhages. These outcomes were not expected from studies performed in rodents. It is critical to determine if other animal models better predict side effects of immunotherapies. Mouse lemur primates can develop amyloidosis with aging. Here we used old lemurs to study immunotherapy based on A beta(1-42) or A beta-derivative (K6A beta(1-30)). We followed anti-A beta(40) immunoglobulin G and M responses and A beta levels in plasma. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging and histology were used to evaluate amyloidosis, neuro-inflammation, vasogenic edema, microhemorrhages, and brain iron deposits. The animals responded mainly to the A beta(1-42) immunogen. This treatment induced immune response and increased A beta levels in plasma and also microhemorrhages and iron deposits in the choroid plexus. A complementary study of untreated lemurs showed iron accumulation in the choroid plexus with normal aging. Worsening of iron accumulation is thus a potential side effect of A beta-immunization at prodromal stages of Alzheimer's disease, and should be monitored in clinical trials. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据