4.5 Article

Inhibition of serine palmitoyltransferase reduces Aβ and tau hyperphosphorylation in a murine model: a safe therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 34, 期 8, 页码 2037-2051

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.02.001

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Serine palmitoyltransferase; Inhibition; Amyloid beta; Tau hyperphosphorylation; MicroRNA

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [R01GM079688, R01GM089866]
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET 0941055]
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  4. Directorate For Engineering [941055] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The contribution of the autosomal dominant mutations to the etiology of familial Alzheimer's disease (AD) is well characterized. However, the molecular mechanisms contributing to sporadic AD are less well understood. Increased ceramide levels have been evident in AD patients. We previously reported that increased ceramide levels, regulated by increased serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT), directly mediate amyloid beta (A beta) levels. Therefore, we inhibited SPT in an AD mouse model (TgCRND8) through subcutaneous administration of L-cylcoserine. The cortical A beta(42) and hyperphosphorylated tau levels were down-regulated with the inhibition of SPT/ceramide. Positive correlations were observed among cortical SPT, ceramide, and A beta(42) levels. With no evident toxic effects observed, inhibition of SPT could be a safe therapeutic strategy to ameliorate the AD pathology. We previously observed that miR-137, -181c, -9, and 29a/b post-transcriptionally regulate SPT levels, and the corresponding miRNA levels in the blood sera are potential diagnostic biomarkers for AD. Here, we observe a negative correlation between cortical A beta(42) and sera A beta(42), and a positive correlation between cortical miRNA levels and sera miRNA levels suggesting their potential as noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据