4.5 Article

Traumatic brain injury in aged animals increases lesion size and chronically alters microglial/macrophage classical and alternative activation states

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 1397-1411

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.11.013

关键词

Microglia/macrophage; Alternative activation; Traumatic brain injury; Aging; NADPH oxidase; Neurodegeneration; Ym1

资金

  1. National Capital Area Rehabilitation Research Network [R24HD050845]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes chronic microglial activation that contributes to subsequent neurodegeneration, with clinical outcomes declining as a function of aging. Microglia/macrophages (MG/M phi) have multiple phenotypes, including a classically activated, proinflammatory (M1) state that might contribute to neurotoxicity, and an alternatively activated (M2) state that might promote repair. In this study we used gene expression, immunohistochemical, and stereological analyses to show that TBI in aged versus young mice caused larger lesions associated with an M1/M2 balance switch and increased numbers of reactive (bushy and hypertrophic) MG/M phi in the cortex, hippocampus, and thalamus. Chitinase3- like 3 (Ym1), an M2 phenotype marker, displayed heterogeneous expression after TBI with amoeboid-like Ym1-positive MG/M phi at the contusion site and ramified Ym1-positive MG/M phi at distant sites; this distribution was age-related. Aged-injured mice also showed increased MG/M phi expression of major histocompatibility complex II and NADPH oxidase, and reduced antioxidant enzyme expression which was associated with lesion size and neurodegeneration. Thus, altered relative M1/M2 activation and an nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (NADPH oxidase)-mediated shift in redox state might contribute to worse outcomes observed in older TBI animals by creating a more proinflammatory M1 MG/M phi activation state. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据