4.5 Article

Cholinergic system function and cognition in mild cognitive impairment

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 867-877

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.08.015

关键词

Mild cognitive impairment; PET; [C-11]MP4A; Acetylcholine esterase; Cholinergic system; Neuropsychological function; Memory; Kinetic modeling; Principal component analysis

资金

  1. Marga and Walter Boll Foundation
  2. WDH Foundation
  3. EC-FP6-project DiMI (Diagnostic Molecular Imaging) [LSHB-CT-2005-512146]
  4. Alzheimer's Research Trust
  5. Alzheimers Research UK [ART-RF2008-1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evidence for cholinergic dysfunction in very early stages of neurodegeneration like mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is inconclusive. Previous positron emission tomography (PET) studies based on small samples investigated if it is related to memory impairment. We examined whether cortical acetylcholine esterase (AChE) activity is reduced at this stage and correlated with cognitive function. N-[C-11]-methyl-4-piperidyl acetate ([11C]MP4A), a positron emission tomography tracer for measuring cerebral AChE activity in vivo, was applied in 21 controls and 17 MCI patients. Parametric images of AChE activity were analyzed using standard atlas regions. Principal components analysis (PCA) of regional values of AChE activity and correlation analysis with neuropsychological test results was performed. Cortical AChE activity showed a significant decline in MCI patients compared with controls which was most pronounced in temporal regions. They formed the main part of a principal component that was related significantly to verbal and nonverbal memory, language comprehension and executive function. Cholinergic dysfunction is an early hallmark even before onset of dementia at the clinical stage of MCI. Its impact especially on temporal neocortex is associated with impaired neuropsychological function. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据