4.5 Article

Amyloid β-induced ER stress is enhanced under mitochondrial dysfunction conditions

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.04.011

关键词

Endoplasmic reticulum; Alzheimer's disease; Amyloid-beta; Mitochondria; Cytochrome c oxidase; Cybrids

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [Prize L'Oreal/FCT/UNESCO 2004, PIC/IC/83206/2007, SFRH/BD/28403/2006, SFRH/BD/14108/2003]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/28403/2006, SFRH/BD/14108/2003] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previously we reported that endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-mitochondria crosstalk is involved in amyloid-beta (A beta)-induced apoptosis. Now we show that mitochondrial dysfunction affects the ER stress response triggered by A beta using cybrids that recreate the defect in mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase (COX) activity detected in platelets from Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. AD and control cybrids were treated with A beta or classical ER stressors and the ER stress-mediated apoptotic cell death pathway was accessed. Upon treatment, we found increased glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) levels and caspase-4 activation (ER stress markers) which were more pronounced in AD cybrids. Treated AD cybrids also exhibited decreased cell survival as well as increased caspase-3-like activity, poli-ADP-ribose-polymerase (PARP) levels and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL)-positive apoptotic cells. Finally, we showed that A beta-induced caspase-3 activation in both cybrid cell lines was prevented by dantrolene, thus implicating ER Ca2+ release in ER stress-mediated apoptosis. Our results demonstrate that mitochondrial dysfunction occurring in AD patients due to COX inhibition potentiates cell susceptibility to A beta-induced ER stress. This study further supports the close communication between ER and mitochondria during apoptosis in AD. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据