4.5 Article

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase is involved in alpha-synuclein-induced mitochondrial dynamic disorders by regulating dynamin-like protein 1

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 33, 期 12, 页码 2841-2854

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.02.001

关键词

SNCA; Mitochondrial dynamic; DLP1; ERK

资金

  1. National Program of Basic Research of China [2007CB947900, 2010CB945200, 2011CB504104]
  2. Natural Science Fund [30700888, 30770732, 30872729, 30971031, 30870879, 81071024, 81171202]
  3. Key Discipline Program of Shanghai Municipality [S30202]
  4. Shanghai Key Project of Basic Science Research [10411954500]
  5. Shanghai Pujiang Program [09PJ1407500]
  6. Program for Outstanding Medical Academic Leader of Shanghai [LJ 06003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compounding evidence suggests that alpha-synuclein (SNCA) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease (PD) by inducing neurotoxicity. Mitochondria are highly dynamic organelles that undergo fusion and fission processes, the imbalance of which has been viewed as a key trigger for PD. However, the underlying relationship between SNCA and mitochondrial dynamics remains unclear. This study demonstrated that SNCA overexpression not only altered mitochondrial morphology, but also significantly increased the translocation of mitochondrial fission protein dynamin-like protein 1 (DLP1). To further investigate the mechanism of SNCA's effect on mitochondrial dynamics, the proteomic technique, stable isotope labeling of amino acid in cell cultures (SILAC), was used. The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) was confirmed to be involved in the regulation of DLP1 and SNCA-mediated neurotoxicity. Finally, additional results demonstrated that SNCA inducing both mitochondrial dynamic disorders and neurotoxicity could be ameliorated by curcumin through ERK inhibition, which implied that the agent could be used to prevent and treat PD in the future. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据