4.5 Article

Obesity is linked with lower brain volume in 700 AD and MCI patients

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 1326-1339

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.04.006

关键词

Body mass index (BMI); Brain structure; Tensor-based morphometry; ADNI; Alzheimer's disease; Mild cognitive impairment

资金

  1. ADNI (National Institutes of Health) [U01 AG024904]
  2. National Institute on Aging
  3. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  4. NIH [P30 AG010129, K01 AG030514]
  5. Dana Foundation
  6. NIBIB [R01 EB007813, R01 EB008281, R01 EB008432]
  7. NICHD [R01 HD050735]
  8. NIA [R01 AG020098]
  9. National Institutes of Health through the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research [U54-RR021813]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obesity is associated with lower brain volumes in cognitively normal elderly subjects, but no study has yet investigated the effects of obesity on brain structure in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer's disease (AD). To determine if higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with brain volume deficits in cognitively impaired elderly subjects, we analyzed brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 700 MCI or AD patients from 2 different cohorts: the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and the Cardiovascular Health Study-Cognition Study (CHS-CS). Tensor-based morphometry (TBM) was used to create 3-dimensional maps of regional tissue excess or deficits in subjects with MCI (ADNI, n = 399; CHS-CS, n = 77) and AD (ADNI, it = 188; CHS, n = 36). In both AD and MCI groups, higher body mass index was associated with brain volume deficits in frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes; the atrophic pattern was consistent in both ADNI and CHS populations. Cardiovascular risk factors, especially obesity, should be considered as influencing brain structure in those already afflicted by cognitive impairment and dementia. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据