4.5 Article

S100B/RAGE-dependent activation of microglia via NF-κB and AP-1 Co-regulation of COX-2 expression by S100B, IL-1β and TNF-α

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 665-677

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.05.017

关键词

S100B; RAGE; Microglia; IL-1 beta; TNF-alpha; COX-2; NF-kappa B; AP-1

资金

  1. Minister dell'Istruzione, dell'Universitia della Ricerca-University of Perugia [FIRB 2001, RBAU014TJ8_001]
  2. Fondazione Cassa di Risparimo di Perugia [2004.0282.020_001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extracellular S100B is known to affect astrocytic, neuronal and microglial activities, with different effects depending on as concentration Whereas at relatively low concentrations S100B exerts trophic effects on neurons and astrocytes. at relatively high concentrations the protein causes neuronal apoptosis and activates astrocytes and microglia, thus potentially representing an endogenous factor implicated in neuroinflammation We have reported that RAGE ligation by S100B in BV-2 microglia results in the upregulation of expression of the pro-inflammatory cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX-2) via parallel Ras-Cdc42-Rac1-dependent activation of c-Jun NH2 terminal protein kinase (JNK) and Ras-Rac1-dependent stimulation of NF-kappa B transcriptional activity We show here that (1) S100B also stimulates AP-1 transcriptional activity in microglia via RAGE-dependent activation of JNK. (2) S100B upregulates IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha expression in microglia via RAGE engagement. and (3) S100B/RAGE-induced upregulation of COX-2, IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha expression requires the concurrent activation of NF-kappa B and AP-1 We also show that S100B synergizes with IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha to upregulate on COX-2 expression in microglia Given the crucial roles of COX-2, IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha in the inflammatory response, we propose that, by engaging RAGE. S100B might play an important role in microglia activation in the course of brain damage (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据