4.5 Article

White matter pathology isolates the hippocampal formation in Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 244-256

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.03.013

关键词

Alzheimer; Aging; Diffusion tensor imaging; Fractional anisotropy; Diffusivity; MRI; White matter; Dementia; Hippocampus; Entorhinal; Memory; Axial diffusivity; Radial diffusivity; Tractography; Volume; Hyperintensities; T2; Myelin; Axon

资金

  1. NIH [K01 AG024898]
  2. Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Pilot [AG05886]
  3. National Center for Research Resources [P41RR14075]
  4. Mental Illness and Neuroscience Discovery (MIND) Institute
  5. National Alliance for Medical Image Computing (NAMIC) [U54 EB05149]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prior work has demonstrated that the memory dysfunction of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is accompanied by marked cortical pathology in medial temporal lobe (MTL) gray matter. In contrast, changes in white matter (WM) of pathways associated with the MTL have rarely been studied. We used diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to examine regional patterns of WM tissue changes in individuals with AD. Alterations of diffusion properties with AD were found in several regions including parahippocampal WM, and in regions with direct and secondary connections to the MTL. A portion of the changes measured, including effects in the parahippocampal WM, were independent of gray matter degeneration as measured by hippocampal volume. Examination of regional changes in unique diffusion parameters including anisotropy and axial and radial diffusivity demonstrated distinct zones of alterations, potentially stemming from differences in underlying pathology, with a potential myelin specific pathology in the parahippocampal WM. These results demonstrate that deterioration of neocortical connections to the hippocampal formation results in part from the degeneration of critical MTL and associated fiber pathways. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据