4.5 Article

Absence of α-synuclein affects dopamine metabolism and synaptic markers in the striatum of aging mice

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 796-804

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.11.001

关键词

Synuclein; Null mutant; Synucleinopathy; Parkinson's disease; Ageing; Dopaminergic neurons; Substantia nigra; Neuroprotection; Synaptoprotection

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite numerous evidences for neurotoxicity of overexpressed alpha-synuclein, a protective function was suggested for endogenous alpha-synuclein and other members of the synuclein family. This protective role is most important for and evident in presynaptic terminals, where synucleins are normally accumulated. However, mice lacking synucleins display no adverse phenotype. In particular, no significant changes in striatal dopamine metabolism and only subtle deficit of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra were found in juvenile or adult mice. To assess whether aging and synuclein deficiency may have additive detrimental effect on the nigrostriatal system, we studied dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra and their striatal synapses in 24-26-month-old alpha-synuclein and gamma-synuclein null mutant mice. Significant similar to 36% reduction of the striatal dopamine was found in aging alpha-synuclein, but not gamma-synuclein null mutant mice when compared to age-matching wild type mice. This was accompanied by the reduction of TH-positive fibers in the striatum and decrease of striatal levels of TH and DAT. However, no progressive loss of TH-positive neurons was revealed in the substantia nigra of synuclein-deficient aging animals. Our results are consistent with a hypothesis that alpha-synuclein is important for normal function and integrity of synapses, and suggest that in the aging nervous system dysfunction of this protein could become a predisposition factor for the development of nigrostriatal pathology. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据