4.5 Article

Selective noradrenergic vulnerability in alpha-synuclein transgenic mice

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 31, 期 12, 页码 2103-2114

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.11.010

关键词

Parkinson's disease; Alpha-synuclein; Noradrenaline; Locus coeruleus; Dopamine; Transgenic; Tyrosine hydroxylase; Olfactory bulb; Spinal cord

资金

  1. Michael J. Fox Foundation
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Classical pathological signs of Parkinson's disease (PD) include loss of dopaminergic neurons in substantia nigra (SN) and noradrenergic neurons in locus coeruleus (LC), and deposition of Lewy bodies rich in the presynaptic protein alpha-synuclein (ASYN). Mammalian genetic models based on ASYN overexpression, however, have generally not reproduced the profound dopaminergic deficit of PD and do not display classical PD phenotypes. In the current study we examined these catecholaminergic systems in transgenic (Tg) mice expressing the A53T mutant of human ASYN under the Prion promoter. Surprisingly we detected a substantial reduction in norepinephine (NE), but not dopamine (DA), levels in spinal cord, olfactory bulb and striatum of aged (15-month-old), but not young (4-month-old) transgenic compared to control mice. In spinal cord and olfactory bulb of 15-month-old Tg mice there was an age-dependent decrease in tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) protein levels, which in spinal cord was accompanied by a decrease in TH-positive terminals detected by immunohistochemistry. There was no difference in the number of TH-positive neuron cell bodies in SN or LC between Tg and control mice. We conclude that aberrant ASYN, expressed in both SN and LC, induces preferential degeneration of noradrenergic terminals. These observations suggest that in mice the NE may be more vulnerable than the DA system to the toxic effects of aberrant alpha-synuclein, and are in line with the major damage to the NE system that occurs in patients with PD. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据