4.5 Article

JNK and ERK1/2 pathways have a dual opposite effect on the expression of BACE1

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 30, 期 10, 页码 1563-1573

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.12.015

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; BACE1; gamma-Secretase; Oxidative stress; ERK1/2; c-jun N-terminal kinase

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health and Regione Piemonte
  2. Carisa De Mari and Telethon Foundations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The activity of beta-secretase (BACE1), the endo-protease essential for the production of amyloid beta (A beta) peptides, is increased in brain of late-onset sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD), and oxidative stress is the potential cause of this event. Oxidative stress up-regulates the expression and the activity of BACE1 in cellular and animal models, through a mechanism that involves the increase of gamma-secretase cleavage on APP and the activation of c-jun N-terminal kinase/activator protein 1(JNK/AP1) pathway. We further characterized the cellular pathways that control BACE1 expression under oxidative stress. We investigated the involvement of extracellular signal regulated MAP kinase (ERK1/2) pathway in the regulation of BACE1 expression, since it has been recently shown that ERK1/2 is an endogenous regulator of the gamma-secretase activity. We found that ERK1/2 pathway negatively modulates BACE1 expression and activity. Moreover, we observed that conditions that abrogate the gamma-secretase activity favor the activation of signalling pathways that promote cell survival, such as ERK1/2 and the serine/threonine kinase Akt/protein kinase B (Akt). These data suggest that the positive or negative cellular responses to oxidative stress parallel the activities of the beta- and the gamma-secretase. ERK1/2 and JNK pathways are involved in this bipartite response, which can lead to neurodegeneration or neuroprotection depending on the cellular and environmental conditions or cooperation with other signalling pathways such as Akt cascade. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据