4.5 Article

Prediction and longitudinal study of CSF biomarkers in mild cognitive impairment

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 682-690

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.08.010

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Mild cognitive impairment; CSF biomarkers; Early detection; Longitudinal; Prediction

资金

  1. NIH-NIA [AG12101, AG08051, AG03051]
  2. CRR [MO1 RR0096]
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR000096] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P30AG008051, R01AG012101, R01AG003051, R01AG022374, R01AG013616] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To longitudinally evaluate five cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in the transition from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: A baseline and 2-year follow-up clinical and CSF study of 86 subjects, including 22 MCI patients that declined to AD (MCI-AD), 43 MCI that did not deteriorate (MCI-MCI) and 21 controls (NL-NL). All subjects were studied for total and phosphorylated tau (T-tau, P-tau(231)), amyloid beta (AP) A beta(42)/A beta(40) ratio, isoprostane (IP) as well as P-tau(231)/A beta(42/40) and T-tau/A beta(42/40) ratios. Results: At baseline and at follow-up MCI-AD showed higher levels P-tau(231), T-tau, IP, P-tau(231)/A beta(42/40) and T-tau/A beta(42/40) ratios and lower A beta(42)/A beta(40) than MCI-MCI or NL-NL. Baseline P-tau(231) best predicted MCI-AD (80%, p < 0.001) followed in accuracy by P-tau(231)/A beta(42/40) and T-tau/A beta(42/40) ratios (both 75%, p's < 0.001), T-tau (74%, p < 0.001), A beta(42)/A beta(40) (69%, p, < 0.01), and IP (68%, p <0.01). Only IP showed longitudinal effects (p < 0.05). Conclusions: P-tau(231) is the strongest predictor of the decline from MCI to AD. IP levels uniquely show longitudinal progression effects. These results suggest the use of CSF biomarkers in secondary prevention trials. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据