4.6 Review

Assessment and treatment relevance in elderly glioblastoma patients

期刊

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 1459-1468

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou063

关键词

assessment; database; elderly; glioblastoma; neuro-oncology

资金

  1. French Institut National du Cancer (INCa)
  2. Associations pour la Recherche sur les Tumeurs Cerebrales (ARTC)
  3. Associations pour la Recherche sur les Tumeurs Cerebrales (ARTC Sud)
  4. Groupe de Neuro-Oncologie du Languedoc Roussillon

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor. Its incidence continues to increase in the elderly because the older segment of the population is growing faster than any other age group. Most clinical studies exclude elderly patients, and standards of care do not exist for GBM patients aged >70 years. We review epidemiology, tumor biology/molecular factors, prognostic factors (clinical, imaging data, therapeutics), and their assessments as well as classic and specific endpoints plus recent and ongoing clinical trials for elderly GBM patients. This work includes perspectives and personal opinions on this topic. Although there are no standards of care for elderly GBM patients, we can hypothesize that (i) Karnofsky performance status (KPS), probably after steroid treatment, is one of the most important clinical factors for determining our oncological strategy; (ii) resection is superior to biopsy, at least in selected patients (depending on location of the tumor and associated comorbidities); (iii) specific schedules of radiotherapy yield a modest but significant improvement; (iv) temozolomide has an acceptable tolerance, even when KPS <70, and could be proposed for methylated elderly GBM patients; and (v) the addition of concomitant temozolomide to radiotherapy has not yet been validated but shows promising results in some studies, yet the optimal schedule of radiotherapy remains to be determined. In the future, specific assessments (geriatric, imaging, biology) and use of new endpoints (quality of life and toxicity measures) will aid clinicians in determining the balance of potential benefits and risks of each oncological strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据