4.6 Article

Investigation of the diffusion abnormality index as a new imaging biomarker for early assessment of brain tumor response to radiation therapy

期刊

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 131-139

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/not153

关键词

cancer; diffusion abnormality index; DW-MRI; imaging biomarker

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1 NS064973, R21 CA113699]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffusion MRI, although having the potential to be a biomarker for early assessment of tumor response to therapy, could be confounded by edema and necrosis in or near the brain tumors. This study aimed to develop and investigate the ability of the diffusion abnormality index (DAI) to be a new imaging biomarker for early assessment of brain metastasis response to radiation therapy (RT). Patients with either radiosensitive or radioresistant brain metastases that were treated by whole brain RT alone or combined with bortezomib as a radiation sensitizer had diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI pre-RT and 2 weeks (2W) after starting RT. A patient-specific diffusion abnormality probability function (DAProF) was created to account for abnormal low and high apparent diffusion coefficients differently, reflecting respective high cellularity and edema/necrosis. The DAI of a lesion was then calculated by the integral of DAProF-weighted tumor apparent diffusion coefficient histogram. The changes in DAI from pre-RT to 2W were evaluated for differentiating the responsive, stable, and progressive tumors and compared with the changes in gross tumor volume and conventional diffusion metrics during the same time interval. In lesions treated with whole brain RT, the DAI performed the best among all metrics in predicting the posttreatment response of brain metastases to RT. In lesions treated with whole brain RT bortezomib, although DAI was the best predictor, the performance of all metrics worsened compared with the first group. The ability of DAI for early assessment of brain metastasis response to RT depends upon treatment regimes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据