4.6 Article

Association between leukocyte telomere length and glioma risk: a case-control study

期刊

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 505-512

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/not240

关键词

glioma risk; logistic regression model; real-time PCR; telomere length

资金

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [81171966]
  3. National Key Technologies R&D Program of China [2011ZX09307-001-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compelling epidemiological evidence indicates that alterations of telomere length are associated with risks of many malignancies in a tumor-specific manner, such as lung cancer, breast cancer, and non-Hodgkins lymphoma. However, the association between leukocyte telomere length and glioma risk has not been investigated. Relative telomere length (RTL) of peripheral blood leukocytes from 467 glioma patients and 467 healthy controls, matched by age and sex, was measured using the real-time PCR-based method in a case-control study. An unconditional multivariate logistic regression model was applied to estimate the association between RTL and glioma risk. Glioma patients showed notably longer RTL than controls (median, 0.555 vs 0.444; P .04). RTL was negatively correlated with age in both cases (? 0.430; P .001) and controls (? 0.388; P .001). After adjusting for age, sex, smoking status and family history of cancer, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there was a U-shaped association between RTL and glioma risk (P for nonlinearity .001). Compared with individuals in the second tertile of RTL, the odds ratios (95 CI) for participants in the first and third tertiles were 2.16 (range, 1.523.09) and 3.51 (range, 2.455.00), respectively. Stratified analysis showed that the association between RTL and glioma risk was not modulated by major host characteristics. Our study demonstrates for the first time that either shorter or longer RTL in peripheral blood leukocytes is associated with increased glioma risk, which warrants further investigation in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据