4.6 Article

miR-181d: a predictive glioblastoma biomarker that downregulates MGMT expression

期刊

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 712-719

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nos089

关键词

biomarker; glioblastoma; MGMT; miR-181d; temozolomide

资金

  1. National Key Project of Science and Technology Supporting Programs [2007BAI05B08]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [30772238, 30730035]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB529406]
  4. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2012AA02A508]
  5. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  6. Sontag Foundation
  7. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  8. Forbeck Foundation
  9. Kimmel Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome-wide microRNA (miRNA) profiling of 82 glioblastomas demonstrated that miR-181d was inversely associated with patient overall survival after correcting for age, Karnofsky performance status, extent of resection, and temozolomide (TMZ) treatment. This association was validated using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset (n = 424) and an independent cohort (n = 35). In these independent cohorts, an association of miR-181d with survival was evident in patients who underwent TMZ treatment but was not observed in patients without TMZ therapy. Bioinformatic analysis of potential genes regulated by miR-181d revealed methyl-guanine-methyl-transferase (MGMT) as a downstream target. Indeed, transfection of miR-181d downregulated MGMT mRNA and protein expression. Furthermore, luciferase reporter assays and coprecipitation studies showed a direct interaction between miR-181d and MGMT 3'UTR. The suppressive effect of miR-181d on MGMT expression was rescued by the introduction of an MGMT cDNA. Finally, MGMT expression inversely correlated with miR-181d expression in independent glioblastoma cohorts. Together, these results suggest that miR-181d is a predictive biomarker for TMZ response and that its role is mediated, in part, by posttranscriptional regulation of MGMT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据