4.6 Article

A pilot study:: 131I-Antitenascin monoclonal antibody 81c6 to deliver a 44-Gy resection cavity boost

期刊

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 182-189

出版社

DUKE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1215/15228517-2007-053

关键词

glioblastoma multiforme; malignant glioma; monoclonal antibody; radioimmunotherapy

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA108786, 1P50 CA 108786-01, R37 CA011898, CA 11898] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [P50 NS020023, NS 20023] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and assess the efficacy and toxicity, among newly diagnosed malignant glioma patients, of administering I-131-labeled murine antitenascin monoclonal antibody 81C6 (I-131-81C6) into a surgically created resection cavity (SCRC) to achieve a patient-specific, 44-Gy boost to the 2-cm SCRC margin. A radioactivity dose of I-131-81C6 calculated to achieve a 44-Gy boost to the SCRC was administered, followed by conventional external beam radiotherapy (XRT) and chemotherapy. Twenty-one patients were enrolled in the study: 16 with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and 5 with anaplastic astrocytoma. Twenty patients received the targeted 44-Gy boost (+/-10%) to the SCRC. Attributable toxicity was mild and limited to reversible grade 3 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia (n = 3; 14%), CNS wound infections (n = 3; 14%), and headache (n = 2; 10%). With a median follow-up of 151 weeks, median overall survival times for all patients and those with GBM are 96.6 and 90.6 weeks, respectively; 87% of GBM patients are alive at 1 year. It is feasible to consistently achieve a 44-Gy boost dose to the SCRC margin with patient-specific dosing of I-131-81C6. Our study regimen (I-131-81C6 + XRT + temozolomide) was well tolerated and had encouraging survival. To determine if selection of good-prognosis patients affects outcome associated with this approach, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved a trial randomizing newly diagnosed GBM patients to either our study regimen or standard XRT plus temozolomide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据