4.6 Article

A phase I trial of temozolomide and lomustine in newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas of childhood

期刊

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 569-576

出版社

DUKE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1215/15228517-2008-019

关键词

CCNU (lomustine); malignant glioma; pediatrics; temozolomide

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute UO1 [CA 97452]
  2. National Center for Research Resources [M01 RR00188]
  3. Children's Oncology Group (COG) [CA 98543]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A phase I trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide given in combination with lomustine in newly diagnosed pediatric patients with high-grade gliomas. Response was assessed following two courses of therapy at the MTD. Temozolomide was administered to cohorts of patients at doses of 100, 125, 160, or 200 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, along with 90 mg/m(2) lomustine on day 1. Two courses of lomustine/temozolomide were given prior to radiation therapy (RT) and up to six courses were administered afterward. Thirty-two patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting myelosuppression was seen in two of three patients enrolled at the 200 mg/m(2) dose level. One of 14 patients in the expanded MTD cohort (160 mg/m(2)) experienced dose-limiting thrombocytopenia. After two courses at the MTD, one patient with a 5-mm enhancing nodule postoperatively had a complete response, one patient with a large residual temporal lobe glioblastoma had a partial response, and eight patients had stable disease. Several patients developed transient radiographic worsening after completing RT. Median 1- and 2-year overall survivals at the MTD were 60% +/- 13% and 40% +/- 13% with a median of 17.6 months. Thirteen of 20 patients (65%) who underwent MRI scans within 6 months prior to death developed metastatic disease. In conclusion, when administered with 90 mg/m(2) lomustine on day 1, the MTD of temozolomide is 160 mg/m(2)/day x 5. Radiographic changes following RT make determination of early tumor progression difficult. Metastatic disease is common prior to death.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据