4.4 Article

Long-Term Effects of Compost and Cover Crops on Soil Phosphorus in Two California Agroecosystems

期刊

SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
卷 79, 期 2, 页码 688-697

出版社

SOIL SCI SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2014.09.0369

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Fonds Quebecois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies (FQRNT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inefficient P use in agriculture results in soil P accumulation and losses to surrounding ecosystems, highlighting the need to use P inputs more efficiently. Composts reduce the need for mineral fertilizers by recycling P from wastes at the regional scale, whereas cover crops reduce soil P losses and have the potential to increase internal soil P recycling by mobilizing soil P fixed from previous P applications. We studied the effects of compost and cover crops on soil P in two California experiments, using one to measure the effects of a single cover crop mixture and composted poultry manure across different management practices, and the second experiment to evaluate how different cover crops (pure grass, pure mustard, or grass-legumes) and yard compost affected soil P dynamics under organic management. We determined changes in soil P dynamics 8 to 18 yr after long-term experiments were established by measuring chloroform-extractable P, P sorption capacity, P saturation, and Hedley fractions. Cover crops generally increased microbial and organic P, whereas amendment with yard compost increased resin, microbial, and organic P, with no impact of cover crops and yard compost on other pools or on P sorption. In contrast, addition of composted poultry manure significantly increased all soil P pools (microbial, organic, and inorganic) and P saturation. Our results suggest a limited, moderate, and strong role of cover crops, yard compost, and composted poultry manure, respectively, in affecting soil P in California agroecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据