4.7 Article

Bayesian common spatial patterns for multi-subject EEG classification

期刊

NEURAL NETWORKS
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 39-50

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.05.012

关键词

Brain-computer interface; Common spatial patterns; EEG classification; Indian Buffet processes; Nonparametric Bayesian methods

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea [NRF-2013R1A2A2A01067464]
  2. IT R&D Program of MSIP/KEIT [14-824-09-014]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [B0101-14-0307] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multi-subject electroencephalography (EEG) classification involves algorithm development for automatically categorizing brain waves measured from multiple subjects who undergo the same mental task. Common spatial patterns (CSP) or its probabilistic counterpart, PCSP, is a popular discriminative feature extraction method for EEG classification. Models in CSP or PCSP are trained on a subject-by-subject basis so that inter-subject information is neglected. In the case of multi-subject EEG classification, however, it is desirable to capture inter-subject relatedness in learning a model. In this paper we present a non-parametric Bayesian model for a multi-subject extension of PCSP where subject relatedness is captured by assuming that spatial patterns across subjects share a latent subspace. Spatial patterns and the shared latent subspace are jointly learned by variational inference. We use an infinite latent feature model to automatically infer the dimension of the shared latent subspace, placing Indian Buffet process (IBP) priors on our model. Numerical experiments on BCI competition III IVa and IV 2a dataset demonstrate the high performance of our method, compared to PCSP and existing Bayesian multi-task CSP models. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据