4.2 Article

Dicer is required for neural stem cell multipotency and lineage progression during cerebral cortex development

期刊

NEURAL DEVELOPMENT
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1749-8104-8-14

关键词

Cerebral cortex; Stem cells; Dicer; microRNA; Multipotency

资金

  1. Woolf-Fisher Trust (NZ)
  2. Wenner-Gren Foundations
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. Cancer Research UK
  5. MRC [G0900901] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [G0900901] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: During cerebral cortex development, multipotent neural progenitor cells generate a variety of neuronal subtypes in a fixed temporal order. How a single neural progenitor cell generates the diversity of cortical projection neurons in a temporal sequence is not well understood. Based on their function in developmental timing in other systems, Dicer and microRNAs are potential candidate regulators of cellular pathways that control lineage progression in neural systems. Results: Cortex-specific deletion of Dicer results in a marked reduction in the cellular complexity of the cortex, due to a pronounced narrowing in the range of neuronal types generated by Dicer-null cortical stem and progenitor cells. Instead of generating different classes of lamina-specific neurons in order over the 6-day period of neurogenesis, Dicer null cortical stem and progenitor cells continually produce one class of deep layer projection neuron. However, gliogenesis in the Dicer-null cerebral cortex was not delayed, despite the loss of multipotency and the failure of neuronal lineage progression. Conclusions: We conclude that Dicer is required for regulating cortical stem cell multipotency with respect to neuronal diversity, without affecting the larger scale switch from neurogenesis to gliogenesis. The differences in phenotypes reported from different timings of Dicer deletion indicate that the molecular pathways regulating developmental transitions are notably dosage sensitive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据