期刊
NEURAL COMPUTATION
卷 22, 期 11, 页码 2729-2762出版社
MIT PRESS
DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00024
关键词
-
资金
- Brain Network Recovery Group through the James S. McDonnell Foundation [22002082]
- National Institutes of Health [R01 DC7488]
- Centre for Stroke Recovery of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario
We compare 10 methods of classifying fMRI volumes by applying them to data from a longitudinal study of stroke recovery: adaptive Fisher's linear and quadratic discriminant; gaussian naive Bayes; support vector machines with linear, quadratic, and radial basis function (RBF) kernels; logistic regression; two novel methods based on pairs of restricted Boltzmann machines (RBM); and K-nearest neighbors. All methods were tested on three binary classification tasks, and their out-of-sample classification accuracies are compared. The relative performance of the methods varies considerably across subjects and classification tasks. The best overall performers were adaptive quadratic discriminant, support vector machines with RBF kernels, and generatively trained pairs of RBMs.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据