4.7 Article

Community composition, diversity and metabolic footprints of soil nematodes in differently-aged temperate forests

期刊

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 80, 期 -, 页码 118-126

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.10.003

关键词

Soil nematodes; Community composition; Metabolic footprints; Bottom-up control

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31170577, 31170484]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences Visiting Professorship for Senior International Scientists [2013T1Z0014]
  3. Youth Fund for Creative Research Groups, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil nematode communities can provide important information about soil food web structure and function. However, how soil nematode communities and their metabolic footprints change over time in temperate forests is not well known. We examined the changes in the composition, diversity and metabolic footprints of soil nematode communities in three differently-aged (young, mid and old) forests of the Changbai Mountains, China. Carbon flows through different nematode trophic groups were also quantified based on nematode biomasses. The results showed that the highest abundance and diversity of total nematodes was found in the mid forest. Nematode communities were characterized by the replenishment in abundance but not the replacement of dominant genera. A low enrichment footprint in the young forest suggests a decline in available prey, while a high enrichment footprint in the mid forest indicates an increase in resource entry into soil food web. The relationship between the carbon flows of omnivores-predators and fungivores was stronger than that among other trophic groups. Our study shows that bottom-up effects of the vegetation, the soil environment and the connectedness of nematode trophic groups are all important driving forces for nematode community structure in temperate forests. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据