4.7 Article

Plant and microbial uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus affected by drought using N-15 and P-32 tracers

期刊

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 135-142

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.12.021

关键词

Microbial biomass; N/P stoichiometry; Nitrogen; Phosphorus; Plant-microbe interactions; Soil moisture

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [FT100100779]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41101054]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Competition for nutrients between plants and microbes is an important determinant for plant growth, biodiversity and carbon cycling. Perturbations such as drought affect the availability of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), and may cause shifts in uptake of N and P between plants and microbes. Competitiveness for these nutrients may depend on how flexible plants and microbes are in taking up N and P. We used a novel dual isotope labelling technique (N-15 and P-32) to assess short-term uptake of N and P by plants and microbes affected by drought in two different plant-soil systems. Mesocosms were extracted from two grassland sites differing in soil nutrient availability and plant species. Half of the mesocosms were subjected to drought one week prior to injection of N-15 (as KNO3) and P-32 (as (HPO4)-P-3) tracers. Uptake rates of NO3- and P in plants and microbes were estimated based on average source pool enrichment during the labelling period and on plant and microbial recovery of N-15 and P-32 measured after 4 days of labelling. Overall competition for N and P was reduced with drought as less NO3- and P was taken up in plants and microbes. However, plant uptake of NO3- was more sensitive to drought than microbial NO3- uptake, while microbial P uptake was more sensitive than plant P uptake. These different sensitivities to drought by plants and microbes may decouple the N and P cycle with increased drought conditions. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据