3.9 Article

KCNJ10 Mutations Disrupt Function in Patients with EAST Syndrome

期刊

NEPHRON PHYSIOLOGY
卷 119, 期 3, 页码 P40-P48

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000330250

关键词

-

资金

  1. UCLH/UCL Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre
  2. Bnai Brith Leo Baeck Lodge
  3. Special Trustees of Great Ormond Street Hospital
  4. Peter Samuel Trust
  5. St. Peter's Trust for Kidney, Bladder & Prostate Research
  6. Great Ormond Street Hospital Childrens Charity [V0901] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Mutations in the inwardly-rectifying K+ channel KCNJ10/Kir4.1 cause an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by epilepsy, ataxia, sensorineural deafness and tubulopathy (EAST syndrome). KCNJ10 is expressed in the kidney distal convoluted tubule, cochlear stria vascularis and brain glial cells. Patients clinically diagnosed with EAST syndrome were genotyped to identify and study mutations in KCNJ10. Methods: Patient DNA was sequenced and new mutations identified. Mutant and wild-type KCNJ10 constructs were cloned and heterologously expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Whole-cell K+ currents were measured by two-electrode voltage clamping. Results: Three new mutations in KCNJ10 (p.R65C, p.F75L and p.V259fs259X) were identified, and mutation p.R297C, previously only seen in a compound heterozygous patient, was found in a homozygous state. Wild-type human KCNJ10-expressing oocytes showed strongly inwardly-rectified currents, which by comparison were significantly reduced in all the mutants (p < 0.001). Specific inhibition of KCNJ10 currents by Ba2+ demonstrated residual function in all mutant channels (p < 0.05) but V259X. Conclusion: This study confirms that EAST syndrome can be caused by many different mutations in KCNJ10 that significantly reduce K+ conductance. EAST syndrome should be considered in any patient with a renal Gitelman-like phenotype with additional neurological signs and symptoms like ataxia, epilepsy or sensorineural deafness. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据