3.9 Article

Sympathetic Nerve Varicosities in Close Apposition to Basolateral Membranes of Collecting Duct Epithelial Cells of Rat Kidney

期刊

NEPHRON PHYSIOLOGY
卷 113, 期 3, 页码 15-21

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000235246

关键词

-

资金

  1. Leverhulme Emeritus Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There are reports of sympathetic innervation of the nephron and of P2 purinergic receptors on epithelial cells. Since ATP is a cotransmitter with noradrenaline in sympathetic nerves, the objective of the present study was to re-investigate basolateral innervation of rat renal collecting duct epithelial cells by sympathetic nerves in the context of recent data on the effects of ATP on this nephron segment. Methods: Kidney sections were processed for electron immunocytochemistry, using tyrosine hydroxylase rabbit polyclonal antibody, with a second layer of biotinylated donkey anti-rabbit antibody and finally extravidin-horseradish peroxidase. Immunoreactivity was visualised with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine and examined with a Philips CM120 transmission electron microscope. Results: Electron microscopic evidence is presented for close apposition of sympathetic nerve varicosities immunolabelled with tyrosine hydroxylase to principal and intercalated type epithelial cells of the collecting duct of the cortical region. Conclusions: It is suggested that ATP is released as a cotransmitter from sympathetic nerve varicosities to act on basolateral P2 purinoceptors to influence sodium and water (and potentially acid-base) transport, in conjunction with the known (typically inhibitory) actions of autocrine and/or paracrine release of ATP from collecting duct epithelial cells acting via luminal P2 receptors. It is suggested that while luminal responses may dominate under normal physiological conditions, in pathophysiological states, such as stress and dehydration, sympathetic nerves might also be involved in modulating collecting duct fluid and electrolyte transport. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据