3.9 Article

Poor Cell Survival Limits the Beneficial Impact of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation on Acute Kidney Injury

期刊

NEPHRON EXPERIMENTAL NEPHROLOGY
卷 114, 期 3, 页码 E107-E116

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000262318

关键词

Acute kidney injury; Ischemia/reperfusion; Stem cell therapy; Mesenchymal stem cells; Nephron repair; Kidney disease

资金

  1. University of Cologne
  2. Ernst und Berta Grimmke Foundation
  3. Jurgen Manchot Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Although renal tubular epithelium has a great capacity for repair it has been suggested that the administration of mesenchymal stem cells may accelerate the recovery following severe ischemic injury. Methods: Here we analyzed the survival rate and organ distribution of transplanted mesenchymal stem cells as well as their contribution to kidney regeneration after ischemic renal injury using functional tests, histological examination as well as quantitative real-time PCR. Results: Intravenously injected stem cells were mainly trapped in lungs and liver. One hour after injection, less than 1% of the injected stem cells could be detected in the injured kidneys. These cells disappeared within the first few days and did not replace renal epithelial cells precluding substantial transdifferentiation. To clarify whether reinforced stem cell delivery might promote sustained survival or conversion to tubular epithelia, stem cells were directly injected into the injured kidneys. Although these grafted cells also did not show sustained survival or contribute to structural renal repair, stem cell injection was associated with a significant but transient initial decrease in serum creatinine. Conclusion: These data suggest that mesenchymal stem cells do not significantly contribute to epithelial renewal after ischemic injury, promoting the idea that the major impact of cell-based therapy for acute kidney injury may result from paracrine or endocrine effects unrelated to stem cell transdifferentiation. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据