3.8 Article

Warfarin Therapy That Results in an International Normalization Ratio above the Therapeutic Range Is Associated with Accelerated Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease

期刊

NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 115, 期 2, 页码 C142-C146

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000312877

关键词

Warfarin; Serum creatinine; Acute kidney injury; Chronic kidney disease

资金

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [UL1RR025755] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [UL1 RR025755] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: We had previously reported that acute kidney injury (AKI) in warfarin-treated chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients may occur shortly after an acute increase in the International Normalization Ratio (INR) >3.0 with formation of occlusive red blood casts. Recovery from this warfarin-associated AKI is poor. Here we investigated whether excessive warfarin therapy could accelerate the progression of CKD. Methods: We analyzed serum creatinine (SC) and INR in 103 consecutive CKD patients on warfarin therapy in our Nephrology program from 2005 to the present. Results: Forty-nine patients experienced at least 1 episode of INR >3.0. Of these, 18 patients (37%, Group 1) developed an unexplained increase in SC >= 0.3 mg/dl coincident with INR >3.0 (mean SC increase 0.61 +/- 0.44 mg/dl); 31 patients (63%, Group 2) showed stable SC (mean SC change 0.04 +/- 0.19 mg/dl). Subsequent CKD progression was accelerated in Group 1, but not in Group 2. The 2 groups were not different with respect to demographics, comorbidities, blood pressure, or therapies. However, African Americans were over-represented in Group 1 (p = 0.035). Conclusions: Overanticoagulation is associated with faster progression of CKD in a high percentage of patients. Our results indicate the need for prospective trials. Nevertheless, we suggest that our findings are sufficiently compelling at this point to justify extra caution in warfarin-treated CKD patients to avoid overanticoagulation. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据