3.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Interleukin-8 and Acute Kidney Injury following Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Prospective Cohort Study

期刊

NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 113, 期 3, 页码 C148-C154

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000232595

关键词

Cardiac surgery; Acute kidney injury; Chemokine; Interleukin-8

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [K23DK065102, R03DK077751] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R03DK077751, DK065102, R03 DK077751, K23 DK065102] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) elicits an inflammatory response mediated partly by neutrophils, which are activated and recruited by interleukin-8 (IL-8). We hypothesized that acute kidney injury (AKI) following CPB might be mediated by IL-8 and examined the association of perioperative plasma IL-8 levels with AKI in a prospective cohort. Methods: Plasma IL-8 was measured before, and 2, 24 and 48 h following CPB. Two AKI definitions, a serum creatinine increase of >= 0.3 mg/dl or 50% (AKI Network [AKIN] stage-1) or >= 50% alone (AKI-50%), within the first 72 h, were used. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUCs) were generated and multivariable logistic regression analyses performed. Results: A total of 143 patients were enrolled. The baseline mean serum creatinine was 1.1 mg/dl (SD = 0.3), the CPB perfusion time was 112 min (SD = 43). Twenty-nine percent of the patients developed AKIN stage-1 and 13% AKI-50%. The plasma IL-8 level 2 h after CPB was higher in AKIN stage-1 (p = 0.03) and AKI-50% (p < 0.01), and predicted AKIN stage-1 (AUC = 0.62; p = 0.02) and AKI-50% (AUC = 0.72; p < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, the 2-hour plasma IL-8 level was associated with 1.36- and 1.59-fold higher odds for AKIN stage-1 and AKI-50%, respectively (p = 0.05). Conclusion: Plasma IL-8 predicts the development of AKI following CPB, supporting a potential involvement for this chemokine in the pathogenesis of AKI. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据