3.8 Article

Serum levels of the advanced glycation end products N-epsilon-carboxymethyllysine and pentosidine are not influenced by treatment with the angiotensin receptor II type 1 blocker irbesartan in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy and hypertension

期刊

NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 108, 期 4, 页码 C291-C297

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000127838

关键词

advanced glycation end products; angiotensin II type 1 blockers; irbesartan; diabetic nephropathy; N-epsilon-carboxymethyllysine; pentosidine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: The aim of this post-hoc analysis of a prospective study in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy was to investigate whether treatment with the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker irbesartan leads to a reduction in the serum levels of the advanced glycation end products (AGEs) pentosidine and N-epsilon-carboxymethyllysine (CML). Methods: One hundred and ninety-six patients of the Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial cohort (mean age 61 +/- 6.5 years, 62 female, 134 male) with a mean estimated glomerular filtration rate of 47.7 ml/min were treated with irbesartan (n = 65), the calcium channel blocker amlodipine (n = 61) or by placebo (n = 70). Serum levels of pentosidine and CML were measured at baseline and after follow-up (23.4 months). Results: Estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased in all groups by a mean of 8.6 ml/min. Serum levels of AGEs increased significantly (p < 0.001) during followup. After controlling for renal function and total protein concentration, changes were 53, 55, 50% for pentosidine and 29, 24, 23% for CML (irbesartan, amlodipine and placebo group, respectively). The increase was not significantly different between the treatment groups. Conclusion: Irbesartan did not alter the increase in pentosidine and CML in serum of type 2 diabetic patients with progressive nephropathy. This finding suggests that angiotensin receptor blockade alone is insufficient to reduce serum levels of AGEs in diabetic nephropathy. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据