4.6 Article

Are there better alternatives than haemoglobin A1c to estimate glycaemic control in the chronic kidney disease population?

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 2167-2177

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfu006

关键词

diabetes; chronic kidney disease; glycaemic control; guideline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although measurement of haemoglobin A1c has become the cornerstone for diagnosing diabetes mellitus in routine clinical practice, the role of this biomarker in reflecting long-term glycaemic control in patients with chronic kidney disease has been questioned. Consensus review paper based on narrative literature review. As a different association between glycaemic control and morbidity/mortality might be observed in patients with and without renal insufficiency, the European Renal Best Practice, the official guideline body of the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association, presents the current knowledge and evidence of the use of alternative glycaemic markers (glycated albumin, fructosamine, 1,5-anhydroglucitol and continuous glucose monitoring). Although reference values of HbA1C might be different in patients with chronic kidney disease, it still remains the cornerstone as follow-up of longer term glycaemic control, as most clinical trials have used it as reference.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据