4.6 Article

When do we need competing risks methods for survival analysis in nephrology?

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 28, 期 11, 页码 2670-2677

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gft355

关键词

censoring; competing risks; epidemiology; statistics; survival analysis

资金

  1. European Community [HEALTH-F2-2009-241544 (SysKID)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Survival analyses are commonly applied to study death or other events of interest. In such analyses, so-called competing risks may form an important problem. A competing risk is an event that either hinders the observation of the event of interest or modifies the chance that this event occurs. For example, when studying death on dialysis, receiving a kidney transplant is an event that competes with the event of interest. Conventional methods for survival analysis ignoring the competing event(s), such as the KaplanMeier method and standard Cox proportional hazards regression, may be inappropriate in the presence of competing risks, and alternative methods specifically designed for analysing competing risks data should then be applied. This problem deserves more attention in nephrology research and in the current article, we therefore explain the problem of competing risks in survival analysis and how using different techniques may affect study results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据