4.6 Article

Human cord blood CD133+ cells exacerbate ischemic acute kidney injury in mice

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 27, 期 10, 页码 3781-3789

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfs110

关键词

acute kidney injury; apoptosis; inflammation; ischemia-reperfusion; stem cells

资金

  1. Department of Medicine at The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa
  2. Kidney Research Scientist Core Education and National Training (KRESCENT) program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Acute kidney injury (AKI) in humans has few therapeutic options. In experimental models, administration of progenitor cells facilitates recovery from AKI. Human umbilical cord-derived CD133(+) progenitor cells promote endothelial repair in ischemic limb, heart and brain tissue. Methods. We examined the effects of human CD133(+) progenitor cells in bilateral ischemiareperfusion (I/R) kidney injury in non-obese diabetic severe combined immunodeficient mice. CD133(+) cells from human cord blood were injected intravenously at the time of reperfusion and the extent of injury was determined by plasma biochemistry and kidney histology. Results. In mice with I/R, fluorescently labeled CD133(+) cells were detected in blood 2 min after injection but decreased rapidly thereafter with no evidence of homing to the kidneys. In mice subjected to I/R, CD133(+) cells significantly increased plasma urea and Cr at 24 h compared to vehicle- or CD133(-) cell-treated mice. CD133(+) cells exacerbated tubular necrosis and apoptosis, increased plasma tumor necrosis factor- and increased kidney neutrophil infiltration. In contrast, CD133(+) cells did not affect tubular cell proliferation. Administration of CD133(+) cells to FVB/N mice post-I/R also augmented kidney injury. Conclusions. These data indicate that human cord blood-derived CD133(+) cells unexpectedly exacerbate ischemic AKI in mice, possibly through soluble factors. Our study highlights the importance of caution in cell-based therapies for human AKI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据