4.6 Review

Klotho, phosphate and inflammation/ageing in chronic kidney disease

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 iv6-iv10

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfs426

关键词

ageing; Klotho; inflammation; NF-kappaB; phosphate

资金

  1. ISCII
  2. FEDER [CP04/00060, PS09/00447, 06/0046]
  3. Sociedad Espanola de Nefrologia
  4. ISCIII-RETIC [REDinREN/RD06/0016]
  5. Comunidad de Madrid [CIFRA/S-BIO0283/2006]
  6. Fundacion Conchita Rabago
  7. Programa Intensificacion Actividad Investigadora (ISCIII/Agencia Lain-Entralgo/CM)
  8. Genzyme
  9. [S2010/BMD-2378]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evidence is emerging for the inflammatory nature of many ageing-associated diseases, including atherosclerosis, vascular calcification, diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD), among others. Ageing itself results in chronic low-grade inflammation that promotes end-organ damage. Inflammatory organ damage, in turn, may contribute to inflammation. Recent research has identified the kidney-secreted hormone Klotho as a central player at the ageinginflammation interface. Thus, systemic or local renal inflammation decreases kidney Klotho expression. Klotho down-regulation may be induced by specific cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor- or TWEAK through the canonical activation of the inflammatory transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NFB) and, specifically RelA. In addition, inflammatory cytokines lead to the epigenetic inactivation of Klotho transcription. Klotho itself has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and the canonical NFB component RelA is one of its targets. Klotho is a key regulator of phosphate balance and a role of phosphate in ageing has been shown. However, the potential relationship between phosphate and inflammation requires further clarification. A correct understanding of these interactions may lead to the design of novel therapeutic approaches to CKD and CKD-related inflammatory and ageing features as well as to inflammation/ageing in general.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据