4.6 Article

Albuminuria increases cystatin C excretion: implications for urinary biomarkers

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 96-103

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr222

关键词

acute kidney injury; albumin; biomarkers; cystatin C; proteinuria

资金

  1. University of Otago
  2. Australian and New Zealand Society of Nephrology
  3. Health Research Council of New Zealand [HRC 05/131]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Low-molecular weight (LMW) proteins, including albumin and novel urinary biomarkers of acute kidney injury (AKI) such as cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), are normally absorbed from the glomerular filtrate by receptor-mediated transport. We evaluated the effect of albuminuria on urinary excretion of novel biomarkers. Methods. Sprague-Dawley rats given four injections over 2 days of 5 mg/g body wt/day bovine serum albumin (BSA) in saline were compared with controls given saline alone. Urinary cystatin C, albumin and protein excretion rates were compared prior to treatment (Day -1), after treatment (Day 2) and 4 days later (Day 6). A preliminary assessment of the clinical effect of proteinuria on the filtered urinary biomarkers cystatin C and NGAL was made by comparison with the effect on urinary interleukin-18 (IL-18) that is not absorbed from the glomerular filtrate, in a cohort of intensive care unit patients. Results. BSA induced transient increases in albuminuria, proteinuria and cystatinuria (P < 0.01, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). Beyond a threshold 6-fold increase in albuminuria, cystatin C absorption was reduced by competitive inhibition. The excretion rates of all analytes returned to preinjection levels by Day 6. Clinical proteinuria was associated with increasing cystatin C and NGAL concentrations (n = 90, P < 0.0001) but not IL-18 (P = 0.12). Conclusions. Proteinuria may increase the threshold for detection of AKI by increasing the excretion of LMW protein biomarkers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据